Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Nana Strikes Again

2012 will go down in Australian history as the year we officially achieved Nana status. Already dismayed and disillusioned about where our society is headed, I spat out my toothpaste in disgust when I heard on the radio that the Australian Government will introduce tougher child care centre laws next year in relation to the naughty corner and religious and cultural activities.

As of  next year, child care centres can risk fines up to $50 000 and $10 000 for supervisors if they are seen to "separate" a child from the group or make them participate in cultural activities such as decorating a Christmas tree or go on a Easter egg hunt.

According to the Education and Care Services National Act, centres must "ensure that a child being educated and cared for by the service is not separated from other children for any reason other than illness or an accident...and that children cannot be "required to undertake activities that are inappropriate, having regard to each family and cultural values, age and physical and intellectual development."

The wording of "separation" without clear definition has centres worried. Alliance president Gwynn Bridge told The Australian newspaper, "There is time out but naughty corners went out years ago. You move a child away from the group and talk to them about their behaviour. But we don't know the meaning of the word 'separate' - is it distance? This needs clarification otherwise people will be in breach without realising it."

But is separating a child for doing something wrong such a bad thing? Bridges makes mention that you speak to the child about their behaviour but we are talking about a person under 5 here; can they fully comprehend that they have done something wrong if they aren't made to feel they have?

It seems that over the years telling a child "no" was seen as a bad thing. Young university students training to be teachers are told you can't tell a child "no". Why not? What harm does it do?

Jan Deans is the Director of Early Learning Centre at the University of Melbourne and believes that removing a child from their peer group can be damaging. "It can affect children's self esteem. It is something that has been seen as inappropriate for quite a long time... I think common sense would tell you that if you were regularly having to experience separation from others and made to feel less worthy, that child would gradually start to feel not as confidant as other members who are receiving positive affirmation."

As a former sports coach, if one of my children was misbehaving and was putting themselves and others around them at risk, I would make them have a sit down and think about what they had done. They got a warning, but if they did it again, time out. Yes, sometimes I had tears and once I had a parent accost me and ask why her child was sitting down, but I told her that her child had done the wrong thing and that she could join in again after a brief sit down. I only had to do it once and the child learnt.

Whether they felt embarrassed or ashamed, I don't know, what I do know is that they realised they had done something they wern't supposed to and were punished by missing out on some fun. I think that's the bottom line: we have become so worried about what is right for our children that we will have a generation of children ill prepared for the world. NEWS FLASH: Life isn't fair, there are winners and there are losers. Sometimes you have to work hard to get what you want and sometimes no matter how hard you try you may not get it, but you have to be in it to win it. We are wrapping children in cotton wool so tight that when they claw out of the cocoon, they're going to fall flat on their faces and won't have a clue how to fly.

The new inclusion of children no longer being allowed to take part in Christmas tree decorating and Easter egg hunts saddens me. I understand that as Australia grows in population, so too does it's diverse religions but decorating a tree and hunting for chocolate is fun and one that I don't see it as offensive, but, staying true to form, the Australian Government doesn't want to offend the minority. What if centres celebrated and introduced different cultural activities so no on was left out? Surely educating and broadening the minds of children is not a bad thing? I understand the argument is that no child should have a religious or cultural experience forced upon them, but come on! It's decorating a tree and looking for sugary goodness! It's hardly the devil at play!

I don't have children yet but I know that if or when I do, I know I'll want the best for them and that includes them being taught the difference between right or wrong, not just pandering to their whims and considering what might hurt their feelings. Who cares if they miss out on  a few minutes of activities because they did something wrong, as long as they learn from their mistake? Talk to them by all means but leave them to stew. What are we teaching our children? That their actions won't have consequences?

Perhaps the wording of "separation" will become an issue as some parents no doubt will see this as an opportunity to sue , another problem with our society. Parents do the best they can and pray (sorry, "hope" no religious connotations allowed) for the best. But, if we continue to walk down the path we are, society as we know it will die.

Quote Of The Day

"Why not seize the pleasure at once? How often is happiness destroyed by preparation, foolish preparation!"

-Jane Austen

Monday, April 11, 2011

Quote Of The Day

"The greatest wealth is to be rich in friends- but if possible let them be rich friends."

-Ashleigh Brilliant

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Step Back Think

On October 13th, 2006 James Macready-Bryan went out into Melbourne to celebrate his 20th birthday. Like many men his age, life was good. He had just completed an International Baccalaureate and had been excepted into Monash University for Arts/Law. He was liked by many for his friendly persona and sports ability.  But that night, James' life took a sickening twist; James received one punch to the back of the head that left him with an acquired brain injury and robbed him of the ability to talk or feed himself, unable to control his own movements and made him wheelchair bound.

One punch.

Shannon McCormack. Ben Thompson. Cain Aguiar. David Hookes. Matthew McEvoy. Mark Urch. These names may not mean anything to you, or one or two may seem familiar, but you're not sure why. All of the above were king hit or received one punch that changed their lives forever. In the cases of David Hookes, Matthew McEvoy, Mark Urch, Shannon McCormack and Cain Aguiar, one punch killed them. Ben Thompson and James Macready-Bryan are in what doctors call a 'twilight state', neither here or there.

James' friends were sick and tired of opening the newspaper on a Saturday and Sunday morning and reading of a similar case to their friend. Something had to be done, and so Step Back Think was born.

Step Back Think, has two purposes: one, is ongoing support for their friend and secondly to educate young people on the dangers of alcohol fuelled violence and aggressive behaviour. The group began work with the Department of Education creating pilot programs aimed at year 9 students to make them aware of the dangers of aggressive behaviour and to simply, step back and think.

Chief police commissioner Simon Overland dropped a bomb shell of a statistic when he claimed that a 'one-punch homicide' happened in Melbourne once a month.

Step Back Think supports the Victorian Department of Justice campaign, Championship Moves, humorous videos aimed at males ages 18-25 to protect their friends from possible dangerous situations when out drinking. To view all of them, click here.

Other incentives Step Back Think have created are a website created for a venue rating system where people can leave feedback on places on whether they are prone to violence or not. Another incentive is a pre-booking system where you can avoid queses by booking into a place first, an initiative that some places already use.

The jury is out on why Melbourne is becoming more violent. Some think it's alcohol and drugs, others think it's the current generations feeling of self-importance and how-dare-you-knock-me mentality.

Either way, I, like James  Macready-Bryans friends am sick and tired of hearing of another life wasted due to one second of madness. Something has to be done, whether it's an improved police presence or tougher liquor licensing laws or education, something has to get through to these young men (and women) that aggression is not the answer to a problem. Grow some balls, and walk away.

What do you all think? Do you think this sort of program will get thorough to some people or are king hits something we'll have to get used to hearing about? Like the TAC ads do you think it will reach some people, but not all?

Why do you think Melbourne has become more violent?

For more information and to watch a video of those affected by one-punch violence click here